One of the most annoying things about living in a capitalist
culture of consumption is the way third rate shysters can follow a successful and legal path to material success. Of course everyone loves a
good spammer, filling his pockets and your inbox with trash that earns on 5 in a million. That's a sweet five for his flourishing trade. The larger question is why this spamming is a successful social and economic act. But this is not strictly an internet issue.
Television viewers almost have to shield your eyes to watch the new "quiz shows"
dominating the late night UK digital airwaves. These guys take it to a whole new level by asking questions like: "Name 13 items commonly found in women's handbags". Viewers respond in mass at 79p per minute on shows like The Mint and Quizmania but
miss obvious answers like
balaclava and
raw/Rawlplugs (trade name for plugs that allow screws to be fitted into masonry walls) . But of course only a portion of viewers can get through the jammed phone lines and most of the money is made from
those who don't even get a chance to compete.
Labels: culture, economics, internet, media
Spreading the word on the possibilities of new media can be a tedious process. Trying to explain the transformational power of blogs, citizen media, social networking, and the like to the uninitiated takes great patience and determination. Often you end up most frustrated with yourself for not being able to describe what you see happening before your eyes in terms that make sense to people less involved in the early stages. That might be one of the reasons bloggers tend to save these conversations until speaking or linking with each other.
Particular warning goes out to those initiating these discussions with traditional (print/tv/radio) media veterans whose careers are setting against the rising tide. Usually you reach an agreement that "we will just see what happens" with both parties confident of vindication in time.
That's why the "long bet" placed between Dave Winer of Scripting News and New York Times Vice President Martin Nisenholz in 2002 is so intriguing.
The Bet in 2002:
In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of 2007, weblogs will rank higher than the New York Times' Web site.
Superblogger Jason Kottke decided to jump the gun a bit and check the results on eight top news stories in 2005 including hurricane Katrina, the London bombings, elections in Iraq, the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and the appointment of a new pope.
He selected a Google keyword search for each and compared the results for the NY Times, blogs, "citizen" media like Wikipedia and other "traditional" media like the BBC or CNN.
The results make tough reading for Nisenholz as blogs trounce the NY Times on six out of eight events and there is still two years before Winer is coming to collect. But by expanding his analysis to other traditional and citizen media Kottke highlights that on six out of eight events traditional media still scores higher rankings than citizen or blogging sites.
So not sure if the conclusion is that the NY Times continues to suffer from an odd website strategy (presumably at the direction of Nisenholz) where content is often deemed premium (members-only) or requires payment for access. The ultimate triumph of other traditional media in the assessment suggests this might be the case.
Another take would be that there are only a few surviving powerhouses of traditional media that have managed to hold their position in the face of the rising tide of citizen and blog media and it is only a matter of time (perhaps by 2007) before they too fall on their swords.
Regardless it is a terrific exercise in providing a baseline for this debate in 2005 and would be useful to repeat in future years to understand trends and settle bets. And it provides the digerati with a new starting point for describing new media to the old hacks ... "OK. For example. There was this bet in 2002 see ..."Labels: blog, media
The diary of an unashamed
Guardian reader.
It is incredible to ride the tube and have time to read a daily edition, particularly on Monday or Saturdays. The thinking man's London newspaper has found further progressive editorial ground since a design transition to a new Berliner format.
Think about the stories in today's paper:
- The bright side of America. Stardust lands: "We feel like parents awaiting the return of a child who left us young and innocent, who now returns holding answers to the most profound questions of our solar system." Launched in 1999 the Nasa capsule took five years to reach to the comet Wild II which orbits the sun between Mars and Jupiter. The space dust picked up by flying within 150 miles of the comet could hold the secret to the demise of Dinosaurs on earth if iridium is found.
- The dark side of America. 10,000 people protested at the murder of at least 18 people on the Pakistan/Afghanistan border by an unmanned CIA drone. An Iraqi International MA student of mine at City University comments: "They know better than anyone in the world how to make enemies." How about you? Just think about missiles on your home and community. "There is nothing left. Pieces of the missile are scattered all around. The impact of the explosions has been huge. Everything has been blackened in a 100-meter radius."
- Want some bulletproof Armani?
- The rigorous review of academic publishing is under further threat. Norwegian cancer scientist Jon Sudboe is exposed as a fake by falsifying every patient in his study of orla cancer. 250 of Dr Subdoe's sample of 908 people had the same birthday.
- In Brazil 4,000 slaves were freed last year by the government from 183 farms who mine unemployed workers in impoverished rural communities: "The first impoverishment is that of the soul. Often a worker will have the false sense that he is in the wrong if he flees."
- Prehistoric remains found in northern Spain indicate that neanderthal man mastered some primitive techniques for crossing the sea into Europe from Africa. Small islands may have existed in Strait of Gibaltar making the journey much less than the eight miles of today.
- Over 3,000 child soldiers in Burundi have been demobalized but have little to do and are seeking reintegration with guerilla armies.
- While the 24-hour news giants fight for a relatively small number of viewers they are overlooking the biggest threat to their existence: on-demand broadband multimedia."Rolling news is no longer the future. In 2004 the average broadband household spent 16 hours a week online. As anyone who uses any half-decent news platform on the web understands, the internet is faster, delivers instant depth and unrivalled interactivity. Rolling news - and here I mean the concept of a separate channel and its traditional front-end studio format - is the genre of television least suited to survive the transition to the digital age." (annoying registration requirement at mediguardian.co.uk makes it impossible to link to this story)
- "Thierry Henry was in his element, helping himself to a hat-trick of opportunities Middlesborough laid on for him and reveling in the chance to prove his stated commitment to Arsenal on the pitch."
Labels: london, media
With circulation figures recently topping
one million worldwide
, The Economist has established itself as one of the few
international newspapers of record. Opinionated, increasingly full of well structured witty right-wing propaganda, each week is a worthy read and in fact might qualify as the most logical choice for a desert island paper.
It is nice to see a publication so unashamed and informed in its convictions, whether agreeable or not. See for example its stated overall editorial goal to "take part in a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress". At least you know what you are reading. Of course when The Economist speaks of progress it generally means it in the most conventional modernist way of everyone rising up together to be rich, powerful and participatory. It is not surprising that over 50% of Economist readers are in the USA, global superpower of record, who currently have the most to lose from critical questioning of the modus operandi of fiscal-focused globalization, free trade and technological progress. For example more threat to future global growth and survival is seen in high energy prices than in the potentially unsustainable environmental impact of a culture of consumption that promises to starve the earth of natural resources.
But for Economist readers it is a story of preaching to the choir and many are starving for confirmation of meaning in what they do and tired of the constant chatter of pessimistic critics. So it is useful to read predictions and observations on the state of the world from a veritable bible of the status quo.
The following are some of the highlights of the Economist World in 2006:
- Sometime in 2006 more than half the world's population will be living in a town or city. Contrast this with 1800 when only 3% of the population was urbanised.
- By 2026 China's economy will be bigger than America's and India's will be much larger than that of any individual European country. Russia, Brazil and Indonesia will be not be much further behind.
- The global housing boom is the biggest financial bubble in history. A further jump in oil prices could pop this bubble by undermining consumer confidence.
- The concept of "Granularity" will be the trendy focus of management and consultants worldwide as grand global strategies will be desperately out of fashion and business focuses on efficiencies and exploiting local markets.
- The top three business travel destinations in the world are Canadian - Vancouver, Calgary and Toronto. Canadian cities fare best because "they have the right mix of feelgood factors without being too expensive. The large expanse of the Canadian wilderness and its cultural diversity make cities cosmopolitan havens".
- Be prepared for turbulent currency markets as the dangers of a collapsing dollar, a fractured euro or a soaring yuan are feasible risk scenarios.
Labels: economics, media
Are you are a
Blogger (if not why not start a blog)?Need to freshen up?
Read
this month's installement of Notes to learn how to:
- create customized google maps
- promote your blog, and
- join the Technorati tagging revolution
- Probably the coolest "how-to" on the WWW right now is this guide to hacking Google Maps for your own devious purposes. This is for advanced Internet users with a variety of web skills. Here's a couple of examples where people in Boston and Chicago have used the maps to chart public transport routes and this is an example of how maps can be integrated with real estate.
- Promote your blog. Get it out there and let everyone enjoy your joys and misery. Be part of the collective. This post from the amazing Robin Good is a great place to start your promotional campaign. Learn about the benefits of RSS syndication. This is for anyone with a blog.
- One of the different things about open source development is the way technologies develop. Technorati is part of a growing movement of sites tracking blogs and implementing a tag structure that announces the start of a progress to a semantic web for next-generation Internet. Pump up your blog by embedding technorati tags using this tutorial. Also for anyone with a blog and listed with Technorati you might be interested in adding the beta Technorati searchlet to your site. You can see it in action in the right column of this website.
Those young enough to remember the early 1990s will look back fondly at the "how-to" environment that stimulated the early growth of the World Wide Web (WWW). For programmers the tools necessary to learn about HTML, Java, SMIL were provided on websites that were probably the Google PageRank 9 sites of their day.
Well the WWW has grown up a lot since that time. There are now over 10 million blogs and tracking on Technorati and creating and supporting the tools to 'write' content is the explosive growth sector of the Internet. The Open Source movement is further driving a shift to creativity and collaboration in design and content. The dominant media is shifting with it.
Labels: internet, media
Brilliant ideas change the space in which they operate. The newspaper business is quite literally being turned upside down as we speak by a whopper of an idea. The launch of Bluffton Today on April Fool's Day heralds the arrival of citizen journalism to a community of 15,000 in South Carolina, USA. But the impact space is both greater and more abstract than one of the great golfing destinations of the American southwest. Here's what makes citizen journalism so brilliant:
- All stories are sourced from blog postings by members of the community. Everyone in the community gets a free blog and photo gallery. So the actual newspaper content is a reflection of the voices of the readers.
- Editors review blog postings and choose stories for publication in the weekly hard-copy
- If for example, a local baker publishes a story about how to make Christmas cookies, the editor can follow-up to shape the story for publication.
In some ways it is incredible that it has taken so long to arrive at this concept in newspapers - written by the readers. Anyone who is getting some of their content these days from blogs knows the inherent value of a variety of voices speaking from a variety of knowledge spaces. The unique feature of this site is that they are generating an actual newspaper from the postings, offering alternatives on both sides of the digital divide. The possibilities are endless.
See Posting on Collective Intelligence
Labels: internet, media
Ahhhhhhh. Nothing better than a Canadian baseball fan desperate to watch the action from his favorite team, a private passion of sorts, the beloved but cursed Red Sox. So much for the litany of crappy Sports TV you can access in Canada. All four CTV Sportsnets showing the bloody Yankees (61 comeback wins this year by the way, defined as losing after the sixth inning and winning in the end. Do you know how much 61 lashes hurt?) with a ticker across the bottom explaining that fans can watch the Red Sox v Angels on ESPN2. How about Sportsnet2 instead of repetitive broadcasts seemingly distinct only for hockey and baseball (Sportsnet Ontario fans get more Red Sox games). Anyway TSN seems like it never has anything except golf tournaments where Tiger Woods doesn't win. Crap. Crap. Crap.
It's the second time that my digital box has let me down waiting for the start of a Red Sox postseason game. That's 2/2. A good result if you are Manny Ramirez but not the best for beleagured Red Sox fans weary from the effects of the curse but infinitely optimistic in the deepest of hearts. Come on Red Sox fans look into your hearts. They will win thie year. Say it often enough and you'll belive it too. In the meantime I have resorted to camping out in front of my laptop watching MLB.COM broadcast of the Red Sox v Angels over IP. I guess the tide is turning.
You can't believe the torment of a Red Sox fan having to watch a Yankees comeback deep into the night (12th inning and beyond). Luckily I've got IP. But if I didn't these TV producers need a head shake. Hold on. Just watch the Yankees. We'll bring you the Red Sox somewhere 2 hours in. Great. Thank you for the customer service. I bet your manifesto calls for "Customer-Centric" service. We'll you've got it Sportsnet. Center of shit is still shit, except it is all around.
OK. Yankees came back and won 7-6 and Canadian television has connected with the Red Sox game in the top of the fourth inning. And for all you semi-fans who say there is no curse, I will just laugh louder and we won't be able to hear your naysaying because I'll be laughing so loud. :-)
Labels: media, sport